Accounting Automation

Approval Chain

A predefined sequence of reviewers who must sign off on a request, document, or transaction—ensuring that the right eyes see it, policy checks are applied, and accountability is captured before the request is finalised.

A predefined sequence of reviewers who must sign off on a request, document, or transaction—ensuring that the right eyes see it, policy checks are applied, and accountability is captured before the request is finalised.

A predefined sequence of reviewers who must sign off on a request, document, or transaction—ensuring that the right eyes see it, policy checks are applied, and accountability is captured before the request is finalised.

Key Facts

  • Alternate names: sign-off chain, routing path, approval workflow, authorisation chain

  • Typical objects routed: purchase requisitions, expense reports, invoices, contracts, change orders, HR forms

  • Common stakeholders: requester → direct manager → department or budget owner → finance / compliance → executive (for high-value or sensitive items)

  • Routing logic: amount thresholds, cost centre, project code, risk flags, commodity category, supplier rating, geography

  • Tooling: procure-to-pay suites, BPM / workflow engines, low-code platforms (Power Automate, Zapier), Slack/Teams bots, email rules

Why It Matters

  1. Strengthens internal controls – Multiple eyes reduce fraud and catch policy breaches before money or data leaves the organisation.

  2. Boosts accountability – Each approver’s digital signature ties decisions to individuals, creating a defensible audit trail.

  3. Speeds cycle-times (when optimised) – Automated, rules-based routing can cut approval delays from days to minutes.

  4. Aligns spend with budget & strategy – Budget owners see requests before funds are committed, preventing surprise overruns.

Real-World Examples

High-Growth SaaS Company
Uses dynamic routing: expenses ≤ €100 auto-approve; €101–1 000 go to the manager; > €1 000 also hit Finance. Slack approvals and 24-hour escalation cut reimbursement cycle from 8 to 2 days.

Global Manufacturer
Purchase requests over US $50 000 trigger a compliance review plus VP approval. Embedded SoD checks prevent the requester from approving their own PO or invoice, satisfying SOX auditors and reducing exception findings by 60 %.

Diagram / Visual (optional)

A swim-lane diagram showing: Requester → Manager → Finance → Compliance (conditional) → CFO, with automated policy checks at each hop.

Related Terms

  • Expense Approval

  • Intake-to-Procure

  • Procure-to-Pay (P2P)

  • Segregation of Duties (SoD)

  • Workflow Automation

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: What’s the difference between a static and dynamic approval chain?
A: Static chains always follow the same path; dynamic chains adjust automatically based on amount, risk, or commodity—speeding low-risk approvals while adding oversight for high-risk ones.

Q: How many approval levels are ideal?
A: Enough to ensure control without causing bottlenecks; best-practice target is no more than three levels for typical transactions, with automatic escalation if an approver waits > 48 hours.

Q: How does an approval chain enforce segregation of duties?
A: Workflow rules prevent the same user from holding conflicting roles (e.g., requester and approver), and systems log every action for audit review.

If you have any questions or need further assistance, feel free to reach out to our

support team.